首页> 外文OA文献 >MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT campaign: inter-comparison, sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings, and error budget
【2h】

MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT campaign: inter-comparison, sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings, and error budget

机译:在maD-CaT活动期间,maX-DOas测量HONO斜柱密度:相互比较,光谱分析设置的灵敏度研究和误差预算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In order to promote the development of the passive DOAS technique the Multi Axis DOAS – Comparison cam- paign for Aerosols and Trace gases (MAD-CAT) was held at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, from June to October 2013. Here, we systematically compare the differential slant column densities (dSCDs) of nitrous acid (HONO) derived from measurements of seven differ- ent instruments. We also compare the tropospheric difference of SCDs (delta SCD) of HONO, namely the difference of the SCDs for the non-zenith observations and the zenith ob- servation of the same elevation sequence. Different research groups analysed the spectra from their own instruments us- ing their individual fit software. All the fit errors of HONO dSCDs from the instruments with cooled large-size detectors are mostly in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 for an integration time of 1 min. The fit error for the mini MAX-DOAS is around 0.7 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 . Al- though the HONO delta SCDs are normally smaller than 6 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , consistent time series of HONO delta SCDs are retrieved from the measurements of different instruments. Both fits with a sequential Fraunhofer reference spectrum (FRS) and a daily noon FRS lead to similar con- sistency. Apart from the mini-MAX-DOAS, the systematic absolute differences of HONO delta SCDs between the in- struments are smaller than 0.63 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 . The correlation coefficients are higher than 0.7 and the slopes of linear regressions deviate from unity by less than 16 % for the elevation angle of 1 ◦ . The correlations decrease with an increase in elevation angle. All the participants also analysed synthetic spectra using the same baseline DOAS settings to results from their re- spective fit programs. In general the errors are smaller than 0.3 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , which is about half of the sys- tematic difference between the real measurements. The differences of HONO delta SCDs retrieved in the selected three spectral ranges 335–361, 335–373 and 335– 390 nm are considerable (up to 0.57 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 ) for both real measurements and synthetic spectra. We per- formed sensitivity studies to quantify the dominant system- atic error sources and to find a recommended DOAS set- ting in the three spectral ranges. The results show that wa- ter vapour absorption, temperature and wavelength depen- dence of O 4 absorption, temperature dependence of Ring spectrum, and polynomial and intensity offset correction all together dominate the systematic errors. We recom- mend a fit range of 335–373 nm for HONO retrievals. In such fit range the overall systematic uncertainty is about 0.87 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , much smaller than those in the other two ranges. The typical random uncertainty is es- timated to be about 0.16 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , which is only 25 % of the total systematic uncertainty for most of the instruments in the MAD-CAT campaign. In summary for most of the MAX-DOAS instruments for elevation an- gle below 5 ◦ , half daytime measurements (usually in the morning) of HONO delta SCD can be over the detection limit of 0.2 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 with an uncertainty of ∼ 0.9 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 .
机译:为了促进无源DOAS技术的发展,2013年6月至10月,在德国美因兹的马克斯·普朗克化学研究所举办了多轴DOAS –气溶胶和痕量气体比较运动(MAD-CAT)。在这里,我们系统地比较了从七种不同仪器的测量结果中得出的亚硝酸(HONO)的差分斜柱密度(dSCD)。我们还比较了HONO的SCD的对流层差异(δSCD),即对于非天顶观测和相同高程序列的天顶观测,SCD的差异。不同的研究小组使用各自的拟合软件分析了自己仪器的光谱。带有冷却的大型检测器的仪器的HONO dSCD的所有拟合误差大部分在0.1至0.3×10 15分子cm-2的范围内,积分时间为1分钟。小型MAX-DOAS的拟合误差约为0.7×10 15分子cm-2。尽管HONOδSCD通常小于6×10 15分子cm-2,但从不同仪器的测量结果中可以得出一致的HONOδSCD时间序列。两者都符合顺序的弗劳恩霍夫参考光谱(FRS)和每天中午的FRS,因此具有相似的一致性。除mini-MAX-DOAS外,仪器之间HONO delta SCD的系统绝对差小于0.63×10 15分子cm-2。相关系数大于0.7,并且对于1°仰角,线性回归的斜率偏离单位小于16%。随着仰角的增加,相关性减小。所有参与者还使用相同的基线DOAS设置分析了合成光谱,以得出各自拟合程序的结果。通常,误差小于0.3×10 15分子cm-2,大约是实际测量之间系统差异的一半。在实际测量和合成光谱中,在选定的三个光谱范围335–361、335–373和335–390 nm中检索到的HONO delta SCD的差异都很大(高达0.57×10 15分子cm-2)。我们进行了敏感性研究,以量化主要的系统误差源,并在三个光谱范围内找到推荐的DOAS设置。结果表明,水蒸气吸收,O 4吸收的温度和波长相关性,Ring光谱的温度依赖性以及多项式和强度偏移校正共同构成了系统误差。对于HONO检索,我们建议使用335–373 nm的适合范围。在这样的拟合范围内,总体系统不确定性约为0.87×10 15个分子cm-2,比其他两个范围的不确定性小得多。估计典型的随机不确定度约为0.16×10 15分子cm-2,仅占MAD-CAT活动中大多数仪器总系统不确定度的25%。总之,对于大多数高程低于5°的MAX-DOAS仪器,HONO delta SCD的半日时间测量(通常在早晨)可能超过0.2×10 15分子cm-2的检测极限,并且存在不确定性约0.9×10 15分子cm-2。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号